
Zoning & Subdivision
Review Committee
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday – April 17, 2001 –
7:30 p.m.
MCRPC Offices, 2491 Highland Road – Hermitage, PA
|
Members
Present
|
Others
Present
|
|
Samuel
Scott, Chairman
|
Dan
Gracenin, Senior Planner
|
|
Jim
Hogan
|
Dennis
G. Puko, Executive Director
|
|
Fred
Brenner
|
Peggy
Heldorfer, Assoc. Planner
|
|
Chuck
Garrett
|
|
|
Ron
Faull
|
|
|
Burroughs
Price
|
|
|
Clifford
McCandless
|
|
Mr. Scott, Chairman, called the
meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. A quorum was present. Mr. Scott noted that the
Minutes of the March 20, 2001 meeting were mailed prior to tonight’s meeting
and there being no additions, corrections, or deletions, the Minutes stand
approved as read.
N E W B U S I N E S S
1. Final Subdivision Plan –
Village Park – Phase IV-C – Pine Township
– Mr. Puko reviewed this with the Committee noting that last month we tabled
this item. He noted that Phase IV-C has 23 lots, which begin on Village Park
Drive and continue on a short stretch of a new street to be called Hunt Drive
and then carry up a new street called Carriage Lane. Carriage Lane would end in
a temporary cul-de-sac, for the time being. The intent of Carriage Lane would
eventually wind around and be part of the road out to Airport Road. He noted
that the street system would be put in to the specifications of the County
Ordinance. After reviewing the construction requirements, the slope,
cross-sections and profiles, it was noted that they meet the specifications of
our County Ordinance. He noted that the lots (under a half acre to a little over
a half acre) are single-family and they meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements
of Pine Township. He also noted that all lots would have public water and sewer
facilities. The sanitary sewer system would appear on the back of lots 84-87 and
would proceed along Carriage Lane and serve lots to either side of this lane;
water would connect into an existing water valve which would serve the rest of
the development. He noted that the storm water management plan was reviewed and
approved.
Mr. Puko commented that as far as
the water and sewer facilities go, Pine Township verbally said that the design
meets with the Township’s approval. Also, the road meets the design
specifications, which is to be accepted and maintained by the Township. The
Township is working on having a developer’s agreement with Christner Realty
that would state and specify the construction of these streets, the eventual
acceptance by the Township and would provide for a letter of credit, which is an
acceptable financial guarantee on the roads being built. He also noted that
there have been recent discussions on the proper responsible party to be a party
to the letter of credit/financial guarantee. In lieu of the suit that was
brought against the Commission, Attorney Kochems has done some case research and
stated that rightfully the County should be a stated beneficiary of the
financial guarantee. The reason being is that this is a County Ordinance that is
being administered and is not a responsibility that can be given to that
municipality to accept on the County’s behalf, even if the Township is
accepting the road. He noted that since Pine Township is accepting the road and
they want to be a party to the guarantee, Mr. Christner stated that he would
present a letter of credit naming Mercer County and Pine Township as the
beneficiaries in the event of a default to provide for the construction of the
proper road. The developer’s agreement and the financial guarantee are
forthcoming soon. He noted that we received the letter from Grove City Borough
acknowledging that they can provide the capacity for the water. We also received
the Municipal Subdivision Review Form from the Township indicating that the
development meets their expectations. Also, the Township stated that they
approve this subdivision subject to receipt of plans and specs of utilities and
roads and financial guarantee.
In discussion, Mr. Puko noted
that Attorney Lewis McEwen, the County Solicitor has asked to review this letter
of credit concerning being a party to the financial guarantee based on Attorney
Kochems research.
A motion was made by Mr. Hogan
and seconded by Mr. Faull to recommend approval of this Final Plan for Village
Park – Phase IV-C conditioned upon receiving the letter of credit from
Christner Realty. Dr. Brenner abstained. The motion passed.
2. Zoning Ordinance Text
Amendment – City of Hermitage – Mr.
Gracenin reviewed this with the Committee noting that last month this item was
tabled because the amendment required a 1,000-foot separation distance between
adult uses and other adult uses, schools, churches, parks, or uses serving
alcohol. Based on those measurements, there was no location in the City where an
adult use could comply and be located. Since last months meeting, the City
reviewed this more thoroughly and included three definitions: adult bookstore,
adult business, and adult entertainment. He stated that this would be a
conditional use only in the Central Commercial Zoning District and not in the
Highway Commercial Zoning District. The City reduced the 1,000-foot separation
distance to 800-foot separation from a Residential District from any parcel
obtaining a residential church, public or private school or public park or
recreation area and 1,000-foot separation from any other adult business. The
City also removed establishments serving alcohol in order to make the 800-foot
separation work. He also noted that the City did not want to include adult uses
in the Industrial Zoning District, in order to keep them centered in the
community and the police could monitor it easier.
A motion was made by Mr. Price
and seconded by Dr. Brenner to recommend approval of this zoning text amendment
with adding the legislative findings. The motion passed.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business
to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Dennis G. Puko,
Executive Director
Mercer
County Regional Planning Commission
2491 Highland Road, Hermitage, PA 16148
mail@mcrpc.com www.mcrpc.com
home
about mcrpc planning
projects community
development transportation
zoning
subdivision